gre写作考试练习题怎么做
gre写作考试练习题怎么做?今天小编给大家带来gre写作考试练习题怎么做，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
gre写作考试练习题怎么做
如何突破gre写作获得4分，是很多备考gre考生心中的疑问。由于新gre写作的逻辑辩证思维很好，所以很多考生的得分都很低。因此，今天的gre备考攻略，天道留学小编就这个现象谈一下原因，然后在给出具体的解决方案，希望可以给大家的gre备考带来帮助!
一、3大gre写作得分低的原因分析。
第一点：多数报考gre考试的考生都是倾向于去临阵磨枪，语言上虽然慢慢向规范的英文书面语靠拢，但仍缺乏时间上的沉淀而无法达到gre写作本身的语言精练，一步到位的特点。仅仅做到了形似而神不似。因此观点写得稍好一点的同学，就可得到那0.5，如果有语言做支持，就可上到4。
第二点：gre写作练习题是给定的，经过几年下来的前人总结，机考本身已经毫无悬念。高频，模板，例证，范文，大量资料充斥在互联网上并且被专业人士和机构总结印刷成册。考生们只销在考前花两三个月集中练习，得个申请的分数根本不成问题。基础好的人更是一两个月已足矣。但问题也随之而来了，大家都用着同样的参考资料不说，写作水平也都如出一辙，考官看来也就无法分辨孰好孰坏，唯有给出最安全的分数。
第三点：大部分的写作还停留在临摹而不是独立作品的阶段。因为有着现成的模板和例证，在范文的引导下，模仿写作的结构和观点。所以往往造成一篇作文看起来是那么回事儿，但实际上又没有说透的感觉。对题目的意义和作文目的的把握还缺少透彻的理解。所以导致大部分虽然在考前付出无数汗水和努力的考生到最后没能达到理想4分。
二、4大提升技巧助阵gre写作考试。
第一方面：模板要合理利用。因为这实在是一个可以让初学者一目了然，直奔主题的好东西。什么是结构，模板就是结构。模板是骨架，是支撑，但不是灵魂。灵魂的部分当然是文章的主旨，要靠自己在不懈的写作，不断的钻研中去摸索和寻找的。千万不可以依赖模板。一篇没有灵魂的骨架子是没法得高分的。
第二方面：练习是一定要坚持得，从始至终。而且量变到质变的突破是需要时间的。
第三方面:临考前的水平测试是为了让大家去把握时间，更好的进一步的查缺补漏。在考场上，更是要临危不乱，无论出现什么样的题目，相信自己，都是见过的，万变不离其宗，这当然需要练习时不断去完善自己的知识库。 以上就是小编对gre考试写作门槛突破的分析。新gre作文的难度大深圳地产网 1111家有目共睹，那么考生就更应该在新gre写作中加把劲，相信自己的实力一定能行。
第四方面：本来就单调的英语，重复是大忌。所以对于词汇来说，作文需要的高级仍然是那几个，therefore， however， admittedly。机器或者考官一见，马上会锁定，懂得写议论文，就靠它们几个。另外一些常用动词名词等实词的同义词要多背几组，英语的修辞不在华丽，在变幻。句型要多变，表达同种意思的词当然也要变幻。本来就单调的英语，重复是大忌。
GRE Argument写作范文
题目：
"Of the two leading real estate firms in our town---Adams Realty and Fitch Realty---Adams is clearly superior. Adams has 40 real estate agents. In contrast, Fitch has 25, many of whom work only part-time. Moreover, Adams' revenue last year was twice as high as that of Fitch, and included home sales that averaged $168,000, compared to Fitch's $144,000. Homes listed with Adams sell faster as well: ten years ago, I listed my home with Fitch and it took more than four months to sell; last year, when I sold another home, I listed it with Adams, and it took only one month. Thus, if you want to sell your home quickly and at a good price, you should use Adams."
范文：
The author argues that Adams Realty is superior to Fitch Realty. To support this claim the author cites statistics about the number and working hours of agents, and the number and sales prices of homes sold by the two farms. Further, the author cites anecdotal evidence involving personal experience with Fitch and Adams. A careful analysis reveals that this evidence it lends little credible support for argument.
The Claim is partially based on the fact that Adams has more agents than Fitch and that many of Fitch's agents work only part-time. There is no correlation between the number of employees, their working hours and the quality of their work. Without such a link, we could consider the possibility that a smaller firm could be more effective than a larger one and, likewise, that a part-time agent could be more effective than a full-time agent. Besides, the author does not provide any information about the specific number of Adams agents who work part-time.
The claim is also supported by the fact that Adams sold more properties than Fitch last year. One year of sales records is an insufficient sample. It is possible that in most other years Adams could have sold fewer properties than Fitch. Moreover, the disparity in sales volume could be explained by factors other than the comparative quality of the two firms. For example, perhaps Adams serves a denser geographic area or in an area where turnover in home-ownership is higher for reasons unrelated to Adams' effectiveness. It is even possible that the only reason sales volume is higher at Adams is because the company employs more agents but, perhaps, each Adams agent sells fewer homes on average than each Fitch agent does. Without ruling out such alternative explanations for the disparity in sales volume, the author cannot defend the conclusion based on such scant evidence.
Support for the claim is also drawn from the average sales price of homes. This evidence only illustrates that the homes that Adams sells are more valuable on average than the ones that Fitch sells, not that Adams is more effective in selling homes than Fitch. Moreover, it is possible that a few relatively high-priced or low-priced properties skewed these averages, rendering any conclusions about the comparative quality of the two firms based on these averages irrelevant.
The author of the argument indicates that Fitch Realty took a considerably longer time to sell one of the author's homes than it took Adams Realty to sell another one of her homes ten years earlier. However, this disparity can be explained by other plausible factor, for example, changing economic conditions during that ten-year period or a difference in the desirability of the two properties. Without establishing that all other factors affecting the speed of a sale were essentially the same for the two homes, the author should not expect an audience to make a decision on this limited anecdotal evidence.
GRE Argument写作
题目：
The following appeared in a recommendation from the planning department of the city of Transopolis:
"Ten years ago, as part of a comprehensive urban renewal program, the city of Transopolis adapted a large area of severely substandard housing near the freeway for use as an industrial area. Subsequently, several factories were constructed there, crime rates in the area declined, and property tax revenues for the entire city increased. To further revitalize the city, we should now take similar action in a declining residential area on the opposite side of the city. Since some houses and apartments in existing nearby neighborhoods are currently unoccupied, alternate housing for those displaced by this action will be readily available."
Write a response in which you discuss what specific evidence is needed to evaluate the argument and explain how the evidence would weaken or strengthen the argument.
范文：
The planning department for the city of Transopolis recommends, as part of its urban renewal plan, that the city convert a troubled residential area into an industrial park and relocate residents from that area to nearby unoccupied housing. To support this recommendation, the planners point out that ten years ago the city converted an area of substandard housing on the other side of town, near a freeway, for industrial use, and that afterwards the area's crime rate declined while the city's overall property-tax revenue increased. While the recommendation is a sensible one, the argument itself needs to be further developed.
To begin with, the recommendation relies on two assumptions about the effects of the freeway-area conversion. One such assumption is that the freeway-area conversion caused the decline in that area's crime rate. The mere fact that the conversion occurred just prior to the decline does not sufficiently link the decline in crime to the development. It is possible, for example, that ramped up efforts on behalf of the local police got the riff-raff off the streets. However, common sense dictates that when you remove the criminals from troubled urban areas, the crime rate declines. The author of the argument needs to establish that link more effectively.
Another such assumption is that the increase in overall property-tax revenue indicates an increase in tax revenue from properties in the freeway area. Perhaps property-tax revenue from the converted properties remained the same, or even declined, after the conversion, and that the city's overall property-tax revenue increase was attributable to properties located elsewhere in the city. For that matter, perhaps the city raised its property-tax rates shortly after the conversion. In short, without ruling out alternative explanations for the developments that came after the freeway-area conversion, the planners cannot convince me that the conversion was responsible for those developments. However, common sense dictates that with industrial development, economic development follows. The author of the argument needs to establish that link more effectively.
While considering these two assumptions, one needs to consider that even if these links can be drawn, the recommendation is based on a more troubling assumption: that the proposed conversion would carry the same results as the freeway-area conversion. To consider the recommendation, one needs to pay closer attention to the key differences between the two areas that might undermine the comparison. For example, perhaps the properties surrounding the ones converted in the freeway area were not residential. Common sense dictates that occurrences of crime are less likely to occur in areas where few low class people reside. Since at least some nearby housing is available for residents displaced by the proposed conversion, this conversion might not result in any significant decline in the area's crime rate. At the same time, unless unoccupied nearby housing can accommodate all displaced residents, the conversion might create a homelessness problem, thereby undermining the city's objectives.
gre写作考试练习题怎么做相关文章：
★ 党员考试练习试题
gre写作考试练习题怎么做
