雅思阅读备考策略
推荐文章
关于雅思阅读复习备考的策略，你是否还停留在刷题战术，背单词书的阶段?沉醉于每天的啃雅思阅读词汇中却依然难以提高雅思阅读的分数，不如跟着小编一起避开雅思阅读复习中需要注意的5个误区吧。
雅思阅读备考策略 这5个误区要避开
在雅思考试中时间一直都是比较紧张的，作为题量最大的雅思阅读，很多考鸭都会花大量精力去复习雅思阅读，但是因为一些备考复习的坏习惯导致很多考鸭很难在雅思阅读有提高，或是雅思阅读提分非常缓慢。临考在即，一起跟着小站雅思君来了解一下雅思阅读复习备考中需要避开的5个误区吧。
雅思阅读复习误区一，疯狂刷题战术
这个雅思阅读复习坏习惯基本上每一个烤鸭都有，以为阅读就要做题，认为做的越多提升越快分数会越高。所以烤鸭们会陷入一种机械做题的状态，什么题都做。
虽然在这里不能否定大家的这种做法。但是大家一定不可以盲目的刷题，选择复习题的时候不要盲目跟风，最好是选择剑桥的真题，并且根据那个时段的出题情况来选择题目类型，做到与考题动态保持一致。在做题的时候大家也可以选择3篇文章中自己最为熟悉的一题先做，有利于增添信息。在做完了题目之后不要只是草草对完答案了事，而是要将题目精读分析考点，整理词汇。提升整体的阅读水平。
雅思阅读复习误区二，单词混乱记忆
都说的词汇者得阅读，可见词汇在阅读中的重要性。但是很多烤鸭的备考雅思阅读复习坏习惯则是抱着厚重词汇书或是字典，从A到Z死记硬背。这样方法不但不能提高词汇量反而还会增加记忆的难度。
雅思阅读的4000个，但想要熟练的掌握雅思阅读词汇，只要弄明白那些单词是考试重点，重点突破考试词汇。就算没有足够的时间去背4000个单词，也能够考到不错的分数。
雅思阅读复习误区三：怀抱消极心态
在考试的时候难免会有心态问题，对自己缺乏自信，导致考场上紧张焦虑。而且一些烤鸭在考完听力之后发现听力很糟糕，随之就完全影响了阅读的成绩。
雅思阅读复习误区四：时间欠缺规划
有些烤鸭性子慢，喜欢慢慢做题，品味每一个细节，但是这样下来1个小时可能只能做完2篇文章。这样的速度是很难拿到高分的。这里建议大家可以直接先看题，根据题目定位做题。可以有效提高速度。
有慢慢做题的烤鸭就一定会有飞速完成的烤鸭，但结果相同是这样的得分也并不会高。很多人用40分钟就完成了所有的题，然后也不检查，就玩玩笔看看别人。
在阅读考试中如果缺少了时间的规划，很容易造成严重失分，针对这一雅思阅读复习坏习惯，还是建议烤鸭们为自己的做题时间进行规划，在规定的时间范围内完成考题。
雅思阅读复习误区五：纠结答案选项
为了考到高分，烤鸭们都会一直沉溺与对于答案的纠结。给自己造成了过大的压力，结果反而是一塌糊涂。在考试这种关键的时刻，为了分数，大家还是可以考虑该猜就猜，学会舍弃，将精力放在有把握的考题上去。判断题如果定位不到，也不要浪费时间再看一遍了，意义绝对的就选FALSE或NO，相对的就选TRUE或者YES。这个方法虽然不是一个正确的方法，但是在大家对答案犹豫不决时，也是一个节省时间的好办法。
最后提醒各位考鸭，雅思考试时间很紧张，不要花时间纠结考试的答案，争取在最短的时间内把题目做完，有时间再回头检查。在备考雅思阅读考试时，不要盲目题海战术，也不要只背单词，多关注雅思阅读文章中的单词，做题要注意时间规划和心态的调整。关注小站雅思频道，获取更多雅思考试相关资讯。祝各位考鸭早日和雅思分手。
雅思考试阅读模拟练习及答案
Rogue theory of smell gets a boost
1. A controversial theory of how we smell， which claims that our fine sense of odour depends on quantum mechanics， has been given the thumbs up by a team of physicists.
2. Calculations by researchers at University College London (UCL) show that the idea that we smell odour molecules by sensing their molecular vibrations makes sense in terms of the physics involved.
3. That’s still some way from proving that the theory， proposed in the mid-1990s by biophysicist Luca Turin， is correct. But it should make other scientists take the idea more seriously.
4. “This is a big step forward，” says Turin， who has now set up his own perfume company Flexitral in Virginia. He says that since he published his theory， “it has been ignored rather than criticized.”
5. Most scientists have assumed that our sense of smell depends on receptors in the nose detecting the shape of incoming molecules， which triggers a signal to the brain. This molecular ’lock and key’ process is thought to lie behind a wide range of the body’s detection systems： it is how some parts of the immune system recognise invaders， for example， and how the tongue recognizes some tastes.
6. But Turin argued that smell doesn’t seem to fit this picture very well. Molecules that look almost identical can smell very different — such as alcohols， which smell like spirits， and thiols， which smell like rotten eggs. And molecules with very different structures can smell similar. Most strikingly， some molecules can smell different — to animals， if not necessarily to humans — simply because they contain different isotopes (atoms that are chemically identical but have a different mass)。
7. Turin’s explanation for these smelly facts invokes the idea that the smell signal in olfactory receptor proteins is triggered not by an odour molecule’s shape， but by its vibrations， which can enourage an electron to jump between two parts of the receptor in a quantum-mechanical process called tunnelling. This electron movement could initiate the smell signal being sent to the brain.
8. This would explain why isotopes can smell different： their vibration frequencies are changed if the atoms are heavier. Turin’s mechanism， says Marshall Stoneham of the UCL team， is more like swipe-card identification than a key fitting a lock.
9. Vibration-assisted electron tunnelling can undoubtedly occur — it is used in an experimental technique for measuring molecular vibrations. “The question is whether this is possible in the nose，” says Stoneham’s colleague， Andrew Horsfield.
10. Stoneham says that when he first heard about Turin’s idea， while Turin was himself based at UCL， “I didn’t believe it”。 But， he adds， “because it was an interesting idea， I thought I should prove it couldn’t work. I did some simple calculations， and only then began to feel Luca could be right.” Now Stoneham and his co-workers have done the job more thoroughly， in a paper soon to be published in Physical Review Letters.
11. The UCL team calculated the rates of electron hopping in a nose receptor that has an odorant molecule bound to it. This rate depends on various properties of the biomolecular system that are not known， but the researchers could estimate these parameters based on typical values for molecules of this sort.
12. The key issue is whether the hopping rate with the odorant in place is significantly greater than that without it. The calculations show that it is — which means that odour identification in this way seems theoretically possible.
13. But Horsfield stresses that that’s different from a proof of Turin’s idea. “So far things look plausible， but we need proper experimental verification. We’re beginning to think about what experiments could be performed.”
14. Meanwhile， Turin is pressing ahead with his hypothesis. “At Flexitral we have been designing odorants exclusively on the basis of their computed vibrations，” he says. “Our success rate at odorant discovery is two orders of magnitude better than the competition.” At the very least， he is putting his money where his nose is.
雅思考试阅读模拟练习及答案
Questions 1-4
Do the following statements agree with the information given in the passage? Please write
TRUE if the statement agrees with the writer
FALSE if the statement does not agree with the writer
NOT GIVEN if there is no information about this in the passage
1. The result of the study at UCL agrees with Turin’s theory.
2. The study at UCL could conclusively prove what Luca Turin has hypothesized.
3. Turin left his post at UCL and started his own business because his theory was ignored.
4. The molecules of alcohols and those of thiols look alike.
Questions 5-9
Complete the sentences below with words from the passage. Use NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS for each answer.
5. The hypothesis that we smell by sensing the molecular vibration was made by ______.
6. Turin’s company is based in ______.
7. Most scientists believed that our nose works in the same way as our ______.
8. Different isotopes can smell different when ______ weigh differently.
9. According to Audrew Horsfield， it is still to be proved that ______ could really occur in human nose.
Question 10-12
Answer the questions below using NO MORE THAN THREE WORDS from the passage for each answer.
10. What’s the name of the researcher who collaborated with Stoneham?
11. What is the next step of the UCL team’s study?
12. What is the theoretical basis in designing odorants in Turin’s company?
(by Zhou Hong)
Answer Keys and Explanations
1. T 见第一段。“give sth the thumbs up”为“接受“的意思。
2. F 见第三段。 “That’s still some way from proving that the theory， proposed in the mid- 1990s by biophysicist Luca Turin， is correct.”意即“现在尚无法证实生物物理学家Luca在九十年代中期提出的理论是否正确。”
3. NG
4. T 见第六段 “Molecules that look almost identical can smell very different — such as alcohols， which smell like spirits， and thiols， which smell like rotten eggs.”“identical” 一词是“完全相同”的意思。这句话是说alcohols和thiols的分子结构看起来一样，但是它们的味道却相去甚远。
5. Luca Turin 文章第二，三和七段均可看出Luca的理论即人类的鼻子是通过感觉气味分子的震动来分辨气味的。
6. Virginia 见第四段。
7. tongue 见第五段 “This molecular ’lock and key’ process is thought to lie behind a wide range of the body’s detection systems： it is how some parts of the immune system recognise invaders， for example， and how the tongue recognizes some tastes.”
8. the atoms 见第八段 “This would explain why isotopes can smell different： their vibration frequencies are changed if the atoms are heavier.”
9. vibration-assisted electron tunneling 见第九段 ““The question is whether this is possible in the nose，” says Stoneham’s colleague， Andrew Horsfield.” 句中的代词“this”指句首的“vibration-assisted electron tunneling”。
10. Andrew Horsfield 见第九段结尾。
11.proper experimental verification 见第十三段。
12.their computed vibrations 见第十四段
雅思阅读备考策略相关文章：