学习资料库 > 英语资料 > 英语写作 > 写作方法 > GRE写作:模板和提纲哪个重要

GRE写作:模板和提纲哪个重要

若水1147 分享 时间:

GRE写作:模板和提纲哪个重要

模板和提纲哪个重要呢?今天小编给大家带来GRE写作:模板和提纲哪个重要,希望能够帮助到大家,下面小编就和大家分享,来欣赏一下吧。

GRE写作:模板和提纲哪个重要

(1)早点整理出自己的模板,什么是模板,应该怎么准备,会在下面的部分为G亲们说明,所以不用着急。

(2)考试的时候顺序把握好,先读题,形成思路和粗略提纲敲首段,中间每段的主旨句和过渡段,最后敲尾段,根据时间,有层次地补充丰满每段的内容检查拼写语法错误,平时练习的时候就是不断地重复这样的顺序,做到非常熟悉。

(3)狂写,练打字速度,尤其是练自己的模板、固定段落、常用事例的打字速度。当初用Issue部分的时间就可以把Issue和Argu全部写完,Issue上600,Argu上550;平时正常写的话,Issue可以上700,Argu上600,靠的就是固定段落、事例还有模板的打字特别快,基本上Issue模板250字在几分钟之内就搞定了,Argu的模板就更夸张了,总共才500多字,模板就有一大半,而且基本上几分钟之内就可以完全打完。

在备考新GRE作文的过程中,其实是否准备网络流传的“高频”题目并不重要,而重要的是,无论准备什么题目,都能有正确的思考路径和分析方法,并且能够用正确的语言来表达自己的想法。

GRE写作满分范文赏析

"In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives."  

Generalists have the ideas and beliefs of what America is made of. America's wealth of knowledge can be related to the generalists of the past generations and the original leaders of our Constitution Period that helped shape our great nation. If our former leaders would have not been generalists when creating our country's Constitution in the late 1770's, American generations of would have been burdened with the constant understanding that they are doomed to failure.  

The fact that our past leaders were not specialists gave the creation of the Constitution the ability to be changed through amendments passed by our represented leaders of today. The Constitution was created with the ability to adapt to the countries needs and demands in running our society as it changes over time. The generalists approach to this creation of a non-specialized Constitution shows the need for todays generations to continue with the beliefs that a specialist would not follow.  

America has learned from it's past and has done what it can to make the changes through adaption. America's greatness has been from the generalist leaders of the past, thinking for the Americans of the future. Americans with a broad perspective is what will continue to lead our great nation into the twenty-first century.  

COMMENTARY 

This response displays some competence but is flawed by imprecise use of language and limited analysis of the issue.  

The writer supports the claim that generalists are preferable to specialists, offering as evidence the historical example of the generalists who created the U.S. Constitution. The example, while relevant, is not adequately developed. The middle paragraph traces the flexibility of the U.S. Constitution to the generalist orientation of 18th century leaders, but the ideas in the first paragraph are too vaguely expressed to contribute to this discussion, and the final paragraph consists of unsubstantiated generalities.  

Frequent minor errors in punctuation, pronoun use, and verb tense, as well as imprecise syntax and phrasing (e.g., "Generalists have the ideas and beliefs of what America is made of. " and "...gave the creation of the Constitution the ability to...") contribute to the overall inadequacy of this response.

GRE写作满分范文赏析

"In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives."  

The need for generalists is undeniable but one can not underestimate the need and importance of specialists. The medical profession is a good example of an area that requires both generalists and specialists. If there were no generalists in the profession there would be no one to help patients determine when a specialist was needed. There are certain problems that a general practitioner can take care of and there are other problems that are out of his or her league. The general practitioner is the an appropriate place to start when a patient develops a problem. Many times the general practitioner is more than capable of handling problems that arise and other times he or she is unable to fully take control of the patient's care. It isn't a fault with the general practitioners. There is just too much to know for any one person to be an expert on all topics. It takes people years to become experts on a single topic, never mind being an expert on everything in the medical profession.  

I am currently working in a large teaching hospital where the need for both general practitioners and specialists is obvious. When a patient is admitted to a general medicine floor, the general medicine physicians are not always able to deal with every problem the patient has without some help from the specialists. It would be unrealistic, not to mention unfair to the general practitioners, to expect the general practitioners to know everything about everything. The key is to know where everyone's knowledge and area of expertise lie and use their strengths to optimize patient care.  

On the general medicine team in which I worked, the team would constantly be requesting consults from specialists. Whether it be a renal, psychiatric, orthopedic, rehabilitation, speech, gastroenterologist, or any other specialist, their input was constantly needed and used to get the patient well as quickly as possible. The list of specialists can go on longer than one would think and it is just impossible for one person to know everything about each one of them.  

Although the need for generalists is apparent, it would be hard to survive without specialists, also. When a person acts as a generalist, they know little bit about everything, but certainly not a totally inclusive knowledge of everything. The specialist is there to help add the expertise and inclusive knowledge that the generalist may be lacking. The most important thing to remember with specialists and generalists is to recognize both's strengths and weaknesses and capitalize on the strengths to achieve whatever goal may be desired.  

COMMENTARY 

Overall, this is a competent response to the topic. The writer disputes the claim that "specialists are over-rated" and argues from the position that both specialists and generalists are needed. The single extended example clearly supports the premise of the argument as the writer compares the roles and responsibilities of generalists and specialists in the medical profession. By paragraph 3, however, the discussion falters, and the concluding paragraph does little more than repeat ideas presented in the first two paragraphs.  

This essay displays generally adequate control over syntax and usage, and the word choice, while appropriate, lacks precision. 


GRE写作:模板和提纲哪个重要相关文章:

GRE写作:列提纲的注意事项

GRE写作:高分技巧

GRE写作:写作论据的技巧

GRE写作:高分冲刺

GRE写作:怎样准备提纲

376248