GRE写作：满分经验
推荐文章
GRE写作：满分经验
如何在GRE写作中拿到满分呢？今天小编给大家带来GRE写作满分经验，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
GRE写作：满分经验
决定考G本来就是一时冲动的结果，因为对于我来说要付出巨大的时间成本，并且接受短期内得不到任何实际的收益这一事实。
然而，当我看到很多同学纷纷加入到考G行列中，自己也鼓足勇气参加了，就算是为了一个梦，为了自己的将来能有多一点的选择，能够为机会多做尝试。
备考的过程我并没有经历太多的辛酸和劳苦，我很佩服一些学院的同学要在期末顶着论文、实验、期末考试等种.种压力复习备考，我的大量时间大概和大多数人一样花在了单词上。红宝书翻过几遍已经不记得了，也翻过barron's list(但事实证明效果并不好)。
至于说技巧或者经验，在这里我也只能谈一谈我对这个考试的一点感受，希望能给其他同学一点启发。
作文：不要轻视argument
能拿满分对于我来说很意外。关于字数，当时我的情况大概是：“issue500+”，“argument600+”也许大家都在奇怪为什么我argument能写的比issue多，其实我想告诉大家不要看轻argument，不要因为它容易就倾向性的少付出努力，不要忘记评分的时候两部分的权重是一样的。
argument的模版大家应该见过很多，但在这里我想说的是既不要完全套用模版，因为这样会有雷同的危险，也不鼓励在文章结构上过分的创新，可以参考模版提供的结构。写作时不要让人感觉你是在“码字儿”，文章的思想和逻辑性永远是最重要的，也是拿高分的关键。
所以在开头和结尾的评价总结性语句中，你要注意和你在正文中的分析是否匹配，所谓匹配不在于用几个专业定性的词汇，而是要在细节上完美对应。当然把握这一点并不容易，因为涉及到用词和表达能力，在这一点上就要看你个人的水平了，词不在于华丽，而是要准确并且前后一致，并且尽量减少重复。
Issue也是一样，我一直觉得要“意在笔先”，作文最重要的是你要有话可说，这就是为什么在字数上争论没有意义了，你的观点立意一般，你又没有太多的话可说，字数自然上不去，随意的拼凑不见得能拿高分。关于issue还有一点要说，就是宁愿往深里写也不要扩大范围的泛泛而谈。我写的题目是关于英雄反映了一个社会的价值观的，整篇文章我只引用了MichaelJordan这一个例子，当然在选例子的时候也要有讲究。我看到很多人花很多时间和精力搜集素材，写文章的时候喜欢方方面面地进行列举，我不大赞同这样的做法，因为如果例子不是你熟悉的，引用起来也只能停留在浅层次，而没有深度。
语文：多做新题目
能拿到600分，完全靠的是我阅读的功底，还有一点运气，因为这次阅读相对简单。
考试当天没能够跨区对我来说损失很大，很多题目就是一念之差。所以在这里要提醒大家珍惜做新题目的新鲜感，而不要把过多的时间花在反复看已经解决好了的老题目上。这次G6的类反比并不难，既没有偏词怪词，也没有考什么特别的逻辑关系，但是从题目到题支都很少有和过去题目重复的地方。这就是为什么要大家这样做的原因。
GRE写作满分范文赏析
"In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives."
In today's society, there are many people who feel generalist are more broad than specialists. I will discuss how there is a need for generalists in the medical field, education, and the work place. First, I will discuss how there is a need for generalists in the medical field. A generalist in this area would be straight foward with clients. For instance, in explaining to a patient they had cancer. A specialist would use wording that you would believe everything is fine.
Second, I will discuss how there is a need for generalists in the education field. In this field some instructors use "big words" and try to out smart themselves with there own thoughts of character. Last, I will discuss how there is a need for generalists in the workplace. In the workplace the bosses should be open with personell. For instance, instead of acting like they know everything they should be open to knew thoughts and ideas.
COMMENTARY
On the surface, this essay appears to present an organized discussion of the issue. In actuality, there are fundamental deficiencies in analysis and development.
The essay begins with a tautology: "...there are many people who feel generalist are more broad than specialists." Then, in the three short paragraphs that follow, the writer promises to discuss "a need for generalists" in a specific field, but none of these discussions materialize.
The rest of the essay only confirms the sense of "fundamental deficiency." Rather than analyze the issue, the writer unpersuasively vilifies specialists as people who use their power to deceive and mislead others.
Although the errors (sentence fragments, incorrect verb tenses, and awkward syntax) are persistent, language problems alone do not earn this essay a score of "1." Rather, this response fits the scoring guide criterion of showing "little evidence of the ability to develop or organize a coherent response to the topic."
GRE写作满分范文赏析
"In our time, specialists of all kinds are highly over-rated. We need more generalists — people who can provide broad perspectives."
I disagree with the portion of the "Specialists of all kinds are highly overated" statement. Specialists are persons who take care of certain tasks or a specific area of whatever the case may be. These persons contibute more time and effort than those with general titles. the specialists are the ones who can tell or give the client more details on what is happening to them. The generalist can only give broad ideas which can be a number of things. The specialist narrows the ideas down to the specifics. For example if one goes to a "general practioner doctor" for pains in the chest area, he would tell the client that the poblem may be heart burns, or something else that's not be so serious, depending on the symptoms. He may also refer him to a cardiologist to be sure it's not any thing else. The point I'm making is that specialist are people who can help us out even more that our generalist. Also the fact that one would go to a specialist only in dire needs.
COMMENTARY
The response presents a position on the issue but the development of that position is seriously flawed. The writer begins by disagreeing with the assertion that "specialists...are highly over-rated" and then attempts to define and contrast specialists and generalists. The attempt is unsuccessful, partly because the descriptions are vague and ill-conceived.
Whereas the example of going to a "general practitioner doctor" is certainly relevant, the writer's claim that a general practitioner would tell a patient with chest pains that the problem "may be heart burns or something else that's not so serious" seems far-fetched.
The response is further weakened by poor word choice and by numerous errors in sentence structure, usage, and grammar. These problems, while not severe enough to seriously interfere with meaning, contribute to the overall rating of "2."
GRE写作：满分经验相关文章：
★ 英语写作