gre考试写作要求如何达标
推荐文章
gre考试令很多学子发愁，尤其是gre写作总是很难提分，今天小编给大家带来gre考试写作要求如何达标，希望能够帮助到大家，下面小编就和大家分享，来欣赏一下吧。
gre考试写作要求如何达标
在新gre写作要求是什么，就是我们需要备考GRE作文的方向。GRE作文要求考生根据所给的题目，完成一篇表明立场的逻辑立论文。这就考察考生们的知识量和缜密的逻辑思维能力，如何把观点表达清楚是最重要的。
GRE作文练习题涉及社会、文化、科技、历史、政治、艺术等诸多方面。不同类型的题目有较大差别，但在同一类型的题目中却包含了许多命题方向非常接近的题目。
新GRE写作要求大量的gre写作素材储备：
gre考试作文对于论据的要求是非常高的，因此你的名人事例的储备，相关知识量的积累是非常重要的。这一环节也正是GRE考生最为头疼的一部分，举不出支持自己的观点的例子，因此让自己的文章显得只有苍白的论证，缺乏说服力。因此要多读历史，积累例子，尤其关注那些重要的哲学家、科学家、艺术家、政治领袖等人的生平事迹、主要贡献。例如Issue里的这样一道备考资料：“Truly profound thinkers and highly creative artists are always out of step with their time and their society。”(真正影响深远的思想家和具有高度创造力的艺术家总是与他们的时代和社会步伐不一致)。这个题目如果没有必备的那些思想家和艺术家的例子，文章必然缺乏说服力。因此读历史积累写作素材，具体说就是论据素材是拿高分的一个重要环节。
新GRE写作要求完整的逻辑思路：
另外，写提纲对于GRE作文Issue部分的备考是至关重要的，也是最占用时间、最核心的一个环节。每一个题目的提纲力求详细，不用去写开头段和结尾段，就写正文各段你的各个分支观点，也就是正文部分的论证过程。除了论证以外，写完后想想可以用些什么论据，把支持论证的论据也写上。需要强调的是，一定要较为详细地写Issue提纲，否则，在考场如果遇到没有思考过的题目，很容易自乱阵脚，导致失败。此外，题目必须考前按题材分类去写提纲，看懂，知道对立面和大致写作思路。论据往往在同类的很多题目中通用。写完提纲后，再写20-40篇完整的文章(语言能力弱的话，尽量多写)。
GRE写作提分策略详解
写作提分策略
Argument：建议写驳论，因为指出别人的逻辑错误比证明自己的正确性要简单。
177题库，除去重复类似题目，余下90+题目需要准备
6种常规逻辑错误+阅读反驳
最简单的写作：在分析出逻辑反驳框架的同时，必须加强写作练习，还要有相关的批改建议，不然就是积重难返。我们在练习时要加强限时练习，本身GRE的argument会比GMAT相对来说难一点，GMAT基本可以按照咨询公司的case分析法解决，但是GRE还会牵涉很多其他类别的话题，所以必须要刷题库。
Issue准备：
练习观点的打磨：每个人都有自己的观点，这是非常好的，但是在应试考试中，不是所有的观点都建议去写：因为不一定能够在短时间内拿到很高的分数，所以观点也是需要进行筛选的。
观点选择之后的限时练习：不落笔写，永远都会有“我能写”的幻觉。10道issue不计时，锻炼自己的思考和落笔能力，11道开始计时，并不需要30分钟内写完，但是要有尽量缩短时间的意识;当熟悉写作文字和论证之后严格开始计时写。如果写作重要的话，至少练习20+。
高频题库的练习：GRE issue会有一定范围内的高频题库，对于上课的同学，老师们也会给出练习方向，所以需要练习写作;对于自学的同学，可以就相关话题进行google，或者和同学进行讨论，在说清楚道理后，可以进行英文写作，然后互相批改纠正。
GRE作文范文：广告与媒体的问题
GRE写作题目：
“Academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years that scholars' ideas reach only a narrow audience. Until scholars can reach a wider audience，their ideas will have little use.”
近些年来，学科已经细化到了相当的程度以至于学者们的理念只影响小范围的人群。除非学者们能拥有影响等大范围的人群，否则他们的理念将几乎毫无用处。
GRE写作范文：
Although academic disciplines have become so specialized in recent years，scholars' ideas can still reach a wide audience by the advantage of the knowledge structure. We can simply put that it is the human beings' knowledge structure that makes it possible for a scholar's ideas in his specialized discipline to reach a much wider audiences who don't necessarily belong to his own discipline.
The reason why I draw this conclusion will be illustrated by recalling the process of social evolution.
During the passed centuries，the social economy has been greatly boosted by the revolutions in science and technology，which in turn increases the width and depth of academic disciplines to solve unencountered and more complex problems arising in the new situations. To solve new problems，we probably need new methods. That will undoubtedly calls for invention of new ideas，which will certainly adds to human beings' knowledge. Thus with the progress of science and technology，more and more knowledge will be added to the old system. A new problem will come： how the newly obtained knowledge is organized. This problem will be clear when we make classification of the new knowledge according to the old knowledge system. If there is content of the newly-get that doesn't properly belong to any sort of the old system，it means anew discipline will emerge. But could we just assert that the newly formed discipline doesn't possess any relationship with any of the old ones? Certainly not. This is because the new knowledge is obtained through the old methods，which obviously means the new knowledge do have some connections with some old disciplines，otherwise I am quite sure we could not find it!
From the above，we can easily reach the conclusion that every academic discipline has certain relationships with some other ones. The structure of human's knowledge is just like the complexity of a net! And also it is a natural trend that academic disciplines become more and more specialized.
With the depositing and specializing process of knowledge，it causes humans to accommodate themselves to this situation. Because the God gives every person a limited time and energy，it is necessary for a person，who wants to make progress in his discipline，to adjust his knowledge structure to adapt to his research domain，that is to say，to be more devoted to his own research area. On the other hand，if he cares too much for unrelated or less related area，he will probably not be able to bring innovation to his main academic discipline. Simply put，we almost cannot find a man who constructs the Theory of Relativity and in the mean time composes symphony like Mozart's! So we can say every scholar must be more devoted to his own discipline than to others，but a wider knowledge of other disciplines sometimes involuntarily invokes sparks of new ideas.
GRE作文范文及解析:科技历史
Both the development of technological tools and the uses to which humanity has put them have created modern civilizations in which loneliness is ever increasing.
Technology, broadly defined as the use of tools, has a long history.Ever since Erg the caveman first conked an animal with a rock, people have been using technology.For thousands of years, the use of tools allowed people to move ever closer together.Because fields could be cultivated and the technology to store food existed, people would live in cities rather than in small nomadic tribes.Only very lately have Erg's descendants come to question the benefits of technology.The Industrial Revolution introduced and spread technologies that mechanized many tasks.As a result of the drive toward more efficient production and distribution (so the ever larger cities would be supported), people began to act as cogs in the technological machine.Clothing was no longer produced by groups of women sewing and gossiping together, but by down-trodden automation's operating machinery in grim factories.
这一段进行了下定义，随后分别从科技的历史、功用意义等角度进行扩展进行泛化说明。Only very lately这句话把关注点过渡到质疑科技的benefits。随后举例说明。
The benefits of the new technology of today, computers and the internet, are particularly ambiguous. They have made work ever more efficient and knit the world together in a web of information and phone lines. Some visionaries speak of a world in which Erg need not check in to his office; he can just dial in from home.He won't need to go to a bar to pick up women because there are all those chat rooms.Hungry?Erg orders his groceries from an online delivery service. Bored?Download a new game. And yet...
ambiguous可以看出作者的态度。随后欲抑先扬，先让步列举计算机给人类带来的方便，最后一个转折yet…省略句，预示下文要进行反驳
Many people, myself included, are a little queasy about that vision. Erg may be doing work, but is it real work?Are his online friends real friends?Does anything count in a spiritual way if it's just digital?Since the Industrial Revolution, we have been haunted by the prospect that we are turning into our machines: efficient, productive, soulless.The newest technologies, we fear, are making us flat as our screens, turning us into streams of bits of interchangeable data.We may know a lot of people, but we have few real friends.We have a lot of things to do, but no reason to do them. In short, the new technology emphasizes a spiritual crisis that has been building for quite some time.
持否定态度。随后通过排比式的设问，引人思考，随后表明作者的否定态度，认为计算机领域科技进步使得人们失去灵魂，乏味。展开细化证明，最后有一个关键性的小结。
As I try to unravel which I believe about the relative merits of technology, I think it is instructive to remember technology's original result. A better plow meant easier farming, more food, longer lives, and more free time to pursue other things such as art.Our newest technology does not give us more free time; it consumes our free time.We are terminally distracted from confronting ourselves or each other.We stay safe, and lonely, in our homes and offices rather than taking the risk of meeting real people or trying new things.
上文提出问题所在， 本段给予解决问题的方案建议 ;展开部分，采取“反证法”的方式，细化举例说明今天的科技和original result背道而驰，产生消极结果。
While I am certainly not a Luddite, I do believe we need to look for a bit more balance between technology and life.We have to tear ourselves away from the fatal distractions and go out into the world.Technology has given us long lives and endless supplies of information.Now we need to apply that information, use the time we're not spending conking our dinner with a club, and find our reasons for living.
最后结尾，明确作者立场，提出解决问题的方案建议，升华主题。
很多同学很容易进入一个机械的“误区”，喜欢直接“拿来主义”，把现成的思路，例证，闪光句型“抢”过来，这是万万不行的，尤其对于GRE作文来说，因为这会猜到“雷区”：思路语言“雷同”，是没有分的哈。
gre考试写作要求如何达标相关文章：